<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 800 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152236</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Department was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI as the demand under Section 11D was set aside by the lower appellate authority due to insufficient evidence of excise duty collection from customers by the respondents. The Department failed to provide any invoice to challenge the findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 800 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152236</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Department was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI as the demand under Section 11D was set aside by the lower appellate authority due to insufficient evidence of excise duty collection from customers by the respondents. The Department failed to provide any invoice to challenge the findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>