https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152201 The appeal against the rejection of a refund claim for duty paid at the time of provisional release of seized yarn was dismissed. The Additional Commissioner upheld the confiscation of the goods and ordered the amount covered by a Bank Guarantee to be appropriated in lieu of confiscation. The appellant's failure to prove the non-duty paid character of the goods led to the rejection of the refund claim based on the original order that was later overturned. The Tribunal affirmed the duty liability at the time of release, resulting in the rejection of the appeal. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:13:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152201 The appeal against the rejection of a refund claim for duty paid at the time of provisional release of seized yarn was dismissed. The Additional Commissioner upheld the confiscation of the goods and ordered the amount covered by a Bank Guarantee to be appropriated in lieu of confiscation. The appellant's failure to prove the non-duty paid character of the goods led to the rejection of the refund claim based on the original order that was later overturned. The Tribunal affirmed the duty liability at the time of release, resulting in the rejection of the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152201