<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 785 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152182</link>
    <description>The Tribunal vacated the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeal, ruling that the demand of export duty on iron ore was not in accordance with the law. The discrepancy between the date of the let export order and the introduction of the duty levy rendered the duty demand invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 785 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152182</link>
      <description>The Tribunal vacated the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeal, ruling that the demand of export duty on iron ore was not in accordance with the law. The discrepancy between the date of the let export order and the introduction of the duty levy rendered the duty demand invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>