<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 618 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands for Service Tax on persons handling Goods Transport Operators (GTO) as Show Cause Notices were not issued before the retrospective amendment. The decision was based on legal precedents emphasizing the necessity of prior notice, leading to the dismissal of the liabilities in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 618 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands for Service Tax on persons handling Goods Transport Operators (GTO) as Show Cause Notices were not issued before the retrospective amendment. The decision was based on legal precedents emphasizing the necessity of prior notice, leading to the dismissal of the liabilities in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>