<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 217 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152158</link>
    <description>Where freight or delivery charges are separately charged, section 2 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act excludes that amount from turnover. On the factual finding that the assessee separately charged freight and octroi, those sums did not form part of the sale price for sales tax purposes. Cartage was therefore not includible in taxable turnover, and octroi was also excludable as part of delivery cost on the facts found. The question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 217 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152158</link>
      <description>Where freight or delivery charges are separately charged, section 2 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act excludes that amount from turnover. On the factual finding that the assessee separately charged freight and octroi, those sums did not form part of the sale price for sales tax purposes. Cartage was therefore not includible in taxable turnover, and octroi was also excludable as part of delivery cost on the facts found. The question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>