<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 216 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152155</link>
    <description>Rule 8-D of the M.P. Sales Tax (Central) Rules, 1957, which required production of form C in addition to form E-I for exemption under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, was treated as a rule of proof rather than a substantive condition. The statutory scheme under section 6(2) and rule 12(2) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957, requires only the prescribed certificate in form E-I or E-II, while form C applies to a different concessional-rate provision. Where the assessing authority is otherwise satisfied that the sale is a subsequent inter-State sale to a registered dealer, substantial compliance is sufficient and exemption remains available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 216 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152155</link>
      <description>Rule 8-D of the M.P. Sales Tax (Central) Rules, 1957, which required production of form C in addition to form E-I for exemption under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, was treated as a rule of proof rather than a substantive condition. The statutory scheme under section 6(2) and rule 12(2) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957, requires only the prescribed certificate in form E-I or E-II, while form C applies to a different concessional-rate provision. Where the assessing authority is otherwise satisfied that the sale is a subsequent inter-State sale to a registered dealer, substantial compliance is sufficient and exemption remains available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>