<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 784 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that interest on delayed refund claims is payable only after three months from the date of the refund application, aligning with legal precedents and the law. The appellant&#039;s appeal seeking interest from the date of the refund claim filing was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order. The judgment clarified the timeline for interest payment on delayed refunds, in line with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:30:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 784 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that interest on delayed refund claims is payable only after three months from the date of the refund application, aligning with legal precedents and the law. The appellant&#039;s appeal seeking interest from the date of the refund claim filing was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order. The judgment clarified the timeline for interest payment on delayed refunds, in line with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>