<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 126 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152133</link>
    <description>Section 34 revisional power was held to be excluded once the assessee had already appealed against the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order to the Tribunal. The statutory scheme, read with section 36(3), treated section 34(2)(b) as a complete bar to revision after an appeal had been filed, while section 34(2)(a) merely suspended revision during the appeal period. The broader appellate powers of the Tribunal, including power to enhance assessment, supported the view that the revenue&#039;s remedy lay before the Tribunal and not concurrently before the Board of Revenue. The revisional order was therefore invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:08:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 126 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152133</link>
      <description>Section 34 revisional power was held to be excluded once the assessee had already appealed against the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order to the Tribunal. The statutory scheme, read with section 36(3), treated section 34(2)(b) as a complete bar to revision after an appeal had been filed, while section 34(2)(a) merely suspended revision during the appeal period. The broader appellate powers of the Tribunal, including power to enhance assessment, supported the view that the revenue&#039;s remedy lay before the Tribunal and not concurrently before the Board of Revenue. The revisional order was therefore invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>