<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 212 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152114</link>
    <description>Assessment proceedings initiated against a firm before dissolution were held to continue validly after dissolution because the repealed General Sales Tax Act, 1125 contained no provision causing automatic abatement. Reading section 61 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 with section 4 of the Kerala Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125, the Court applied the repeal-and-saving framework to treat the pending assessment as continuing from its inception under the later Act. The later insertion of section 21A did not cut off proceedings already begun, and the assessment was upheld as a lawful continuation against the dissolved firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:03:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 212 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152114</link>
      <description>Assessment proceedings initiated against a firm before dissolution were held to continue validly after dissolution because the repealed General Sales Tax Act, 1125 contained no provision causing automatic abatement. Reading section 61 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 with section 4 of the Kerala Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1125, the Court applied the repeal-and-saving framework to treat the pending assessment as continuing from its inception under the later Act. The later insertion of section 21A did not cut off proceedings already begun, and the assessment was upheld as a lawful continuation against the dissolved firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>