<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 186 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152105</link>
    <description>Khodki charges paid to sugarcane suppliers were treated as part of the consideration for the cane supplied because no resolution, bye-law, rule, or agreement showed that the payment was independent of the purchase contract. A payment made in lieu of goods supplied is includible in taxable turnover, regardless of how or when the seller later uses the money. On that basis, the charges were held liable to sales tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:05:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 186 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152105</link>
      <description>Khodki charges paid to sugarcane suppliers were treated as part of the consideration for the cane supplied because no resolution, bye-law, rule, or agreement showed that the payment was independent of the purchase contract. A payment made in lieu of goods supplied is includible in taxable turnover, regardless of how or when the seller later uses the money. On that basis, the charges were held liable to sales tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>