<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 124 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152095</link>
    <description>A dealer could claim compounded assessment under section 7 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 only by exercising the option and obtaining prior permission from the assessing authority at the start of the year, with advance tax payment in the prescribed manner. Because the assessment year had already commenced and the assessee had not secured the required permission within that year, the benefit could not be claimed later at final assessment. The deletion of rule 15(4-B) reinforced that the compounded scheme was unavailable after the event. The revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded, and the assessee was held ineligible for the compounded rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 124 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152095</link>
      <description>A dealer could claim compounded assessment under section 7 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 only by exercising the option and obtaining prior permission from the assessing authority at the start of the year, with advance tax payment in the prescribed manner. Because the assessment year had already commenced and the assessee had not secured the required permission within that year, the benefit could not be claimed later at final assessment. The deletion of rule 15(4-B) reinforced that the compounded scheme was unavailable after the event. The revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded, and the assessee was held ineligible for the compounded rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>