<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decisions on sales promotion and closing stock valuation. However, the addition under section 68 for cash credits and the allowance of interest on loans were overturned based on the Third Member&#039;s decision, as there was insufficient evidence to support the explanations provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:32:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decisions on sales promotion and closing stock valuation. However, the addition under section 68 for cash credits and the allowance of interest on loans were overturned based on the Third Member&#039;s decision, as there was insufficient evidence to support the explanations provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>