https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152057 Revocation of a COFEPOSA detention order and withdrawal of earlier writ petitions did not oust SAFEMA jurisdiction, because the statutory exception applied only where the detention order had been set aside by a competent court. Properties and monies traced to the person were upheld as illegally acquired where the investment source was unexplained, business funds were linked to surrendered capital and smuggling-related material, and no reliable fresh material displaced that inference. The challenge based on lack of reasonable opportunity also failed, as hearings were given, reasons were supplied before appeal, and no concrete prejudice from any alleged non-supply was shown. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2013 13:48:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152057 Revocation of a COFEPOSA detention order and withdrawal of earlier writ petitions did not oust SAFEMA jurisdiction, because the statutory exception applied only where the detention order had been set aside by a competent court. Properties and monies traced to the person were upheld as illegally acquired where the investment source was unexplained, business funds were linked to surrendered capital and smuggling-related material, and no reliable fresh material displaced that inference. The challenge based on lack of reasonable opportunity also failed, as hearings were given, reasons were supplied before appeal, and no concrete prejudice from any alleged non-supply was shown. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152057