https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152048 The forfeiture authorities under SAFEMA cannot sit in appeal over a COFEPOSA detention order; it remains operative unless set aside by a competent court, so the detenue continued to fall within section 2(2)(b). A section 12A declaration also remained effective because non-reconsideration did not automatically revoke it, and the detenue could not claim the benefit of proviso (iii) to section 2(2)(b). Alleged transfers of the house were ineffective because no valid registered conveyance was proved and, in any event, section 11 renders post-notice transfers ineffective in the proceedings and void on forfeiture, leaving the appellants without locus standi. en-us Wed, 15 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:45:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152048 The forfeiture authorities under SAFEMA cannot sit in appeal over a COFEPOSA detention order; it remains operative unless set aside by a competent court, so the detenue continued to fall within section 2(2)(b). A section 12A declaration also remained effective because non-reconsideration did not automatically revoke it, and the detenue could not claim the benefit of proviso (iii) to section 2(2)(b). Alleged transfers of the house were ineffective because no valid registered conveyance was proved and, in any event, section 11 renders post-notice transfers ineffective in the proceedings and void on forfeiture, leaving the appellants without locus standi. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 15 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152048