https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152044 Later detention orders that remained valid supplied jurisdiction to proceed under the forfeiture law, so the quashing of an earlier detention order did not prevent fresh action. Separately, section 7(1) of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing before a final forfeiture order, even where no reply is filed to the show-cause notice. The absence of a hearing notice created a legal infirmity, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the affected person and considering the relevant material. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:39:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152044 Later detention orders that remained valid supplied jurisdiction to proceed under the forfeiture law, so the quashing of an earlier detention order did not prevent fresh action. Separately, section 7(1) of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing before a final forfeiture order, even where no reply is filed to the show-cause notice. The absence of a hearing notice created a legal infirmity, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the affected person and considering the relevant material. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 28 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152044