https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152041 Penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules was sustained after remand because the earlier remand had confined the proceedings to recomputation of duty and determination of commensurate penalty. The assessee was not permitted to reopen a penalty objection that had not been raised in the earlier round before the Tribunal, and a later challenge to the order of the co-ordinate Bench was treated as impermissible. The objection under Rule 209A was therefore rejected and the penalty upheld. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:21:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152041 Penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules was sustained after remand because the earlier remand had confined the proceedings to recomputation of duty and determination of commensurate penalty. The assessee was not permitted to reopen a penalty objection that had not been raised in the earlier round before the Tribunal, and a later challenge to the order of the co-ordinate Bench was treated as impermissible. The objection under Rule 209A was therefore rejected and the penalty upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152041