<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152024</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI considered a case where the Asstt. Commissioner disallowed capital goods Cenvat credit for welding electrodes used in machinery repair, leading to a Cenvat credit demand and penalty imposition. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Cenvat credit demand but set aside the penalty due to conflicting decisions on the admissibility of Cenvat credit for welding electrodes. The Tribunal upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment deeming welding electrodes eligible for Cenvat credit as capital goods, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposing of the Cross Objection filed by the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152024</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI considered a case where the Asstt. Commissioner disallowed capital goods Cenvat credit for welding electrodes used in machinery repair, leading to a Cenvat credit demand and penalty imposition. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Cenvat credit demand but set aside the penalty due to conflicting decisions on the admissibility of Cenvat credit for welding electrodes. The Tribunal upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment deeming welding electrodes eligible for Cenvat credit as capital goods, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposing of the Cross Objection filed by the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>