https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152020 Chapter VA of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act applied at the freezing stage where the Competent Authority had recorded a prima facie view that a detenu and his associate had generated illegal earnings and that properties standing in the appellant's name were acquired from such earnings. The question whether those properties were only nominally held remained for evidence in the pending forfeiture inquiry. The integrated scheme of freezing and forfeiture under sections 68E to 68H meant that a separate pre-freezing notice was not required where the affected persons were otherwise given notice and an opportunity to reply before the forfeiture proceedings. The freezing order was upheld and the forfeiture inquiry was left to continue. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:23:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152020 Chapter VA of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act applied at the freezing stage where the Competent Authority had recorded a prima facie view that a detenu and his associate had generated illegal earnings and that properties standing in the appellant's name were acquired from such earnings. The question whether those properties were only nominally held remained for evidence in the pending forfeiture inquiry. The integrated scheme of freezing and forfeiture under sections 68E to 68H meant that a separate pre-freezing notice was not required where the affected persons were otherwise given notice and an opportunity to reply before the forfeiture proceedings. The freezing order was upheld and the forfeiture inquiry was left to continue. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152020