<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1010 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicant&#039;s condonation application for a 5-month delay in filing the appeal, citing insufficient justification for the delay in seeking legal advice. The applicant&#039;s claim of receiving wrong advice from their advocate was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the rejection of the condonation request. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of timely legal actions and the need to establish valid reasons for seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1010 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicant&#039;s condonation application for a 5-month delay in filing the appeal, citing insufficient justification for the delay in seeking legal advice. The applicant&#039;s claim of receiving wrong advice from their advocate was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the rejection of the condonation request. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of timely legal actions and the need to establish valid reasons for seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>