https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152006 The Tribunal set aside impugned orders confiscating livestock and imposing penalties for alleged smuggling to Bangladesh due to lack of evidence of smuggling intent and accompanying persons during seizure. The appellants' claims of ownership, supported by police complaints and purchase receipts, were considered valid, especially in light of delayed ownership claims not impacting the case based on precedent. The Tribunal granted the appeals, allowing stay petitions and waiving pre-deposit requirements. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:29:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152006 The Tribunal set aside impugned orders confiscating livestock and imposing penalties for alleged smuggling to Bangladesh due to lack of evidence of smuggling intent and accompanying persons during seizure. The appellants' claims of ownership, supported by police complaints and purchase receipts, were considered valid, especially in light of delayed ownership claims not impacting the case based on precedent. The Tribunal granted the appeals, allowing stay petitions and waiving pre-deposit requirements. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152006