<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 578 - INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151993</link>
    <description>The Special Bench clarified that assessment orders passed before the filing of a settlement application remain in force but cannot be enforced until the final settlement order under section 245D(4) is issued. Lower authorities&#039; orders are not automatically set aside by the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision but are modified to align with the Commission&#039;s order. Interest under section 220(2) is applicable until the date of the order under section 245D(1), and the Settlement Commission has the authority to waive or reduce such interest. Vice-Chairman G. S. Sidhu partially dissented, emphasizing the recoverability of valid tax demands and the chargeability of interest up to the final settlement order date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 578 - INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151993</link>
      <description>The Special Bench clarified that assessment orders passed before the filing of a settlement application remain in force but cannot be enforced until the final settlement order under section 245D(4) is issued. Lower authorities&#039; orders are not automatically set aside by the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision but are modified to align with the Commission&#039;s order. Interest under section 220(2) is applicable until the date of the order under section 245D(1), and the Settlement Commission has the authority to waive or reduce such interest. Vice-Chairman G. S. Sidhu partially dissented, emphasizing the recoverability of valid tax demands and the chargeability of interest up to the final settlement order date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>