<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 910 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the request to store non-duty paid goods outside the factory premises under Rule 4(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal emphasized that space shortage could constitute a valid reason for such permission, highlighting the risks of storing goods outside. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner for reconsideration after providing the appellants with a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 910 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the request to store non-duty paid goods outside the factory premises under Rule 4(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal emphasized that space shortage could constitute a valid reason for such permission, highlighting the risks of storing goods outside. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner for reconsideration after providing the appellants with a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>