<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under section 80G for the donation of Rs. 1,00,000 to D. C. Shah Charitable Trust. The Tribunal held that the material, including the bank summary and the section 80G certificate, was on record, justifying rectification under section 154. The Tribunal distinguished the case law cited by the Revenue authorities, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer should consider all material in the assessment record for correcting mistakes. The Third Member, concurring with the Accountant Member, upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, stating that section 154 cannot rectify omissions without apparent mistakes in the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under section 80G for the donation of Rs. 1,00,000 to D. C. Shah Charitable Trust. The Tribunal held that the material, including the bank summary and the section 80G certificate, was on record, justifying rectification under section 154. The Tribunal distinguished the case law cited by the Revenue authorities, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer should consider all material in the assessment record for correcting mistakes. The Third Member, concurring with the Accountant Member, upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, stating that section 154 cannot rectify omissions without apparent mistakes in the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>