<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1004 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151977</link>
    <description>Prima facie waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the appellant had not shown grounds for complete dispensation in respect of the duty and penalty demand, and the benefit of Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. was not accepted on the facts for interim relief. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit the duty amount within the time granted, while the balance pre-deposit and recovery were stayed subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:06:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1004 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151977</link>
      <description>Prima facie waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the appellant had not shown grounds for complete dispensation in respect of the duty and penalty demand, and the benefit of Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. was not accepted on the facts for interim relief. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit the duty amount within the time granted, while the balance pre-deposit and recovery were stayed subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>