<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1111 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151967</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in a dispute over denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods, because the goods were not installed in the registered factory but were said to be in the appellant&#039;s possession on leased premises. At the stay stage, the Tribunal found the cited precedent prima facie supported the appellant&#039;s claim and held that the issue required fuller examination in the appeals. Recovery of the duty and penalty demand was therefore stayed until disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:04:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1111 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151967</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in a dispute over denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods, because the goods were not installed in the registered factory but were said to be in the appellant&#039;s possession on leased premises. At the stay stage, the Tribunal found the cited precedent prima facie supported the appellant&#039;s claim and held that the issue required fuller examination in the appeals. Recovery of the duty and penalty demand was therefore stayed until disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>