<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 692 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151950</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA held that the appellant&#039;s failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act led to the vacation of the Stay Order. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make the necessary deposit within two weeks, warning that non-compliance would result in the dismissal of the appeal. The decision underscored the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and tribunal orders in customs cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 692 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151950</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA held that the appellant&#039;s failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act led to the vacation of the Stay Order. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make the necessary deposit within two weeks, warning that non-compliance would result in the dismissal of the appeal. The decision underscored the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and tribunal orders in customs cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>