<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1000 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151947</link>
    <description>Reversal of common-input credit attributable to exempted clearances before removal of the goods was treated as non-availment for exemption purposes, so the exemption denial, demand, and penalty were set aside. Handling charges recovered from buyers had to be factually segregated to determine whether they represented loading, unloading, freight, or transit insurance; because that characterisation was not properly examined on the evidence, the valuation demand was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1000 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151947</link>
      <description>Reversal of common-input credit attributable to exempted clearances before removal of the goods was treated as non-availment for exemption purposes, so the exemption denial, demand, and penalty were set aside. Handling charges recovered from buyers had to be factually segregated to determine whether they represented loading, unloading, freight, or transit insurance; because that characterisation was not properly examined on the evidence, the valuation demand was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>