<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1101 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151944</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year in question. The decision was based on the finding that the appellant&#039;s explanations were bona fide and that penalties should not be imposed on estimated additions without clear evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:31:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1101 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151944</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year in question. The decision was based on the finding that the appellant&#039;s explanations were bona fide and that penalties should not be imposed on estimated additions without clear evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>