<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 998 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), KANPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151930</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit may remain available where a purchaser receives inputs under invoices containing required particulars, verifies transport and tax documents, records and uses the goods in dutiable manufacture, and pays through banking channels. Supplier-level fraud allegations alone do not establish that goods were not received or justify denying credit where the purchaser has taken reasonable precautions within its control. Penal liability requires evidence of deliberate contravention, collusion, fraud, or a director&#039;s personal involvement; it does not arise merely from an upstream supplier&#039;s alleged non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:30:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 998 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), KANPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151930</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit may remain available where a purchaser receives inputs under invoices containing required particulars, verifies transport and tax documents, records and uses the goods in dutiable manufacture, and pays through banking channels. Supplier-level fraud allegations alone do not establish that goods were not received or justify denying credit where the purchaser has taken reasonable precautions within its control. Penal liability requires evidence of deliberate contravention, collusion, fraud, or a director&#039;s personal involvement; it does not arise merely from an upstream supplier&#039;s alleged non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>