<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 997 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), KANPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151929</link>
    <description>The appellate authority set aside the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the appellants, ruling that the glass tubes were eligible for Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption and there was no procedural non-compliance. The authority found that the adjudicating authority misinterpreted the SSI notification and wrongly denied the exemption. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 997 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), KANPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151929</link>
      <description>The appellate authority set aside the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the appellants, ruling that the glass tubes were eligible for Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption and there was no procedural non-compliance. The authority found that the adjudicating authority misinterpreted the SSI notification and wrongly denied the exemption. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>