<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 769 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151924</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the apex court in Commissioner v. SKF India Ltd., held that interest on excise duty paid through supplementary invoices due to price revision is payable. Despite arguments raised by the assessees regarding their specific case details and Revenue neutrality, the Tribunal upheld the impugned orders, citing adherence to the apex court&#039;s decision and rejecting the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:11:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 769 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151924</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, following the precedent set by the apex court in Commissioner v. SKF India Ltd., held that interest on excise duty paid through supplementary invoices due to price revision is payable. Despite arguments raised by the assessees regarding their specific case details and Revenue neutrality, the Tribunal upheld the impugned orders, citing adherence to the apex court&#039;s decision and rejecting the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>