<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 917 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151911</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1992-93 to 1995-96 partially and fully allowed the appeal for the assessment year 1996-97. The tribunal reversed the disallowances of rent claims totaling Rs. 3,78,000 for each year, holding that the rent payment for a godown was an allowable business expenditure under sections 30 and 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. The tribunal found that the godown was rented for business purposes, even if not actively utilized, and met the criteria for deductible business expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:46:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 917 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151911</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1992-93 to 1995-96 partially and fully allowed the appeal for the assessment year 1996-97. The tribunal reversed the disallowances of rent claims totaling Rs. 3,78,000 for each year, holding that the rent payment for a godown was an allowable business expenditure under sections 30 and 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. The tribunal found that the godown was rented for business purposes, even if not actively utilized, and met the criteria for deductible business expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>