<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1181 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow the investment allowance under section 32A for the Zinc Cell House for the assessment year 1989-90, subject to verification of the relevant facts by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the initial assessment year for applying section 32AB(10) should be 1989-90 or later, as clarified by the Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular No. 559.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:30:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1181 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow the investment allowance under section 32A for the Zinc Cell House for the assessment year 1989-90, subject to verification of the relevant facts by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the initial assessment year for applying section 32AB(10) should be 1989-90 or later, as clarified by the Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular No. 559.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>