https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151901 The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the duty demand of Rs. 7,66,545.00 and penalty imposed on the Respondent due to alleged shortage of raw materials for manufacturing Branded Biris. The Revenue's appeal against the Adjudicating Authority's order was dismissed as the weighment of raw materials lacked concrete evidence, failing to prove duty evasion. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence for duty demands, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal and disposal of the Respondent's Cross Objection. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:07:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151901 The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the duty demand of Rs. 7,66,545.00 and penalty imposed on the Respondent due to alleged shortage of raw materials for manufacturing Branded Biris. The Revenue's appeal against the Adjudicating Authority's order was dismissed as the weighment of raw materials lacked concrete evidence, failing to prove duty evasion. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence for duty demands, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal and disposal of the Respondent's Cross Objection. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151901