<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 789 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151892</link>
    <description>The Third Member agreed with the Accountant Member&#039;s view that the undisclosed income of Rs. 1,46,02,752 computed by the Assessing Officer should be brought to tax under section 113. The computation method adopted by the Assessing Officer, which included the set-off of current depreciation against undisclosed income, was upheld. The case was referred back to the Bench for an order to be passed in terms of section 255(4) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:41:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 789 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151892</link>
      <description>The Third Member agreed with the Accountant Member&#039;s view that the undisclosed income of Rs. 1,46,02,752 computed by the Assessing Officer should be brought to tax under section 113. The computation method adopted by the Assessing Officer, which included the set-off of current depreciation against undisclosed income, was upheld. The case was referred back to the Bench for an order to be passed in terms of section 255(4) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>