<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151891</link>
    <description>A Duty-Free Import Authorisation issued before 1-4-2007, once export obligation was discharged and transferability endorsed, was treated as transferable for the authorisation or the imported raw materials. Customs sought to insist on a Central Excise certificate showing non-availment of CENVAT credit on inputs used in the exported goods, but the appellant relied on the DFIA scheme and Board Circular No. 11/2009-Cus. read with Notification No. 40/2006-Cus. The Tribunal found a prima facie case in the appellant&#039;s contention and directed that the impugned condition requiring the certificate should not operate pending final adjudication; the condition was stayed till final disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151891</link>
      <description>A Duty-Free Import Authorisation issued before 1-4-2007, once export obligation was discharged and transferability endorsed, was treated as transferable for the authorisation or the imported raw materials. Customs sought to insist on a Central Excise certificate showing non-availment of CENVAT credit on inputs used in the exported goods, but the appellant relied on the DFIA scheme and Board Circular No. 11/2009-Cus. read with Notification No. 40/2006-Cus. The Tribunal found a prima facie case in the appellant&#039;s contention and directed that the impugned condition requiring the certificate should not operate pending final adjudication; the condition was stayed till final disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>