https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151880 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai addressed a difference of opinion between its Vice-President and Member (Technical) regarding an appeal. Following a High Court directive emphasizing the need to frame and decide on issues properly, the Tribunal acknowledged the importance of procedural justice and agreed to rehear the case with a new Division Bench. The Tribunal was granted the authority to rectify mistakes and ensure fairness in the proceedings. The application for reopening the hearing was allowed, with the new Bench instructed to frame issues for determination and proceed with the appeal accordingly. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:25:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151880 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai addressed a difference of opinion between its Vice-President and Member (Technical) regarding an appeal. Following a High Court directive emphasizing the need to frame and decide on issues properly, the Tribunal acknowledged the importance of procedural justice and agreed to rehear the case with a new Division Bench. The Tribunal was granted the authority to rectify mistakes and ensure fairness in the proceedings. The application for reopening the hearing was allowed, with the new Bench instructed to frame issues for determination and proceed with the appeal accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151880