<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 908 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151878</link>
    <description>No manufacture of an intermediate nozzle holder was established where injectors were produced through a continuous assembly, testing and packing process and the nozzle holder emerged only after injector manufacture. Captively consumed nozzles were also held not marketable because the department failed to prove saleability in their used condition, which lacked the treatment needed to give shelf-life for the spare market. On a proper reading of Notifications Nos. 217/85-C.E. and 75/86-C.E., read with the Board&#039;s circular and trade notice, nozzles and nozzle holders used in injector manufacture were treated as eligible for exemption. The duty demand was therefore unsustainable and the exemption benefit remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 908 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151878</link>
      <description>No manufacture of an intermediate nozzle holder was established where injectors were produced through a continuous assembly, testing and packing process and the nozzle holder emerged only after injector manufacture. Captively consumed nozzles were also held not marketable because the department failed to prove saleability in their used condition, which lacked the treatment needed to give shelf-life for the spare market. On a proper reading of Notifications Nos. 217/85-C.E. and 75/86-C.E., read with the Board&#039;s circular and trade notice, nozzles and nozzle holders used in injector manufacture were treated as eligible for exemption. The duty demand was therefore unsustainable and the exemption benefit remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>