<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 890 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, by majority opinion, held that the addition of Rs. 60 lakhs based on diary entries was not justified as there was a lack of corroborative evidence supporting the possession of the said amount. The explanation provided by the assessee regarding the entries being related to planning for his daughter&#039;s marriage was deemed plausible. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 60 lakhs was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:26:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 890 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, by majority opinion, held that the addition of Rs. 60 lakhs based on diary entries was not justified as there was a lack of corroborative evidence supporting the possession of the said amount. The explanation provided by the assessee regarding the entries being related to planning for his daughter&#039;s marriage was deemed plausible. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 60 lakhs was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>