<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 993 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151863</link>
    <description>The appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit despite the rejection of inputs at the pre-manufacturing stage. The appellant should also receive Cenvat credit as there was no duty evasion on the manufactured goods. The penalty imposed on the appellant was unjustified as there was insufficient evidence to support it. Consequently, the decision favored the appellant, rendering the connected appeals irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 993 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151863</link>
      <description>The appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit despite the rejection of inputs at the pre-manufacturing stage. The appellant should also receive Cenvat credit as there was no duty evasion on the manufactured goods. The penalty imposed on the appellant was unjustified as there was insufficient evidence to support it. Consequently, the decision favored the appellant, rendering the connected appeals irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>