https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151860 CESTAT MUMBAI - AT allowed the appeal and set aside the suspension of the CHA licence imposed for a purported non-existent exporter and misdeclaration in a drawback claim. The Tribunal found the CHA had verified the exporter by phone and obtained authorization, and held physical verification was not practicable; further, the suspension was issued after substantial delay, negating urgency. The Tribunal did not rule on potential disciplinary or penal liability under CHA regulations, leaving that to a separate due enquiry. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151860 CESTAT MUMBAI - AT allowed the appeal and set aside the suspension of the CHA licence imposed for a purported non-existent exporter and misdeclaration in a drawback claim. The Tribunal found the CHA had verified the exporter by phone and obtained authorization, and held physical verification was not practicable; further, the suspension was issued after substantial delay, negating urgency. The Tribunal did not rule on potential disciplinary or penal liability under CHA regulations, leaving that to a separate due enquiry. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151860