<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 531 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151843</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, condoning a 180-day delay due to a subsequent Supreme Court decision. It directed the AO to revise the 1989-90 assessment, restoring the investment allowance for leased machinery. The ITAT emphasized the assessee&#039;s legitimate right to contest the withdrawal of the allowance based on updated legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 531 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151843</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, condoning a 180-day delay due to a subsequent Supreme Court decision. It directed the AO to revise the 1989-90 assessment, restoring the investment allowance for leased machinery. The ITAT emphasized the assessee&#039;s legitimate right to contest the withdrawal of the allowance based on updated legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>