<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 991 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for clandestine removal but reduced the penalty imposed on the respondent to 25% of the duty amount in accordance with Section 11AC and relevant case law. The penalty on the Director was also upheld but reduced to Rs. 5,000 due to his involvement in the removal. The Tribunal set aside the previous Order-in-Appeal and reinstated the Order-in-Original with modifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 991 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand for clandestine removal but reduced the penalty imposed on the respondent to 25% of the duty amount in accordance with Section 11AC and relevant case law. The penalty on the Director was also upheld but reduced to Rs. 5,000 due to his involvement in the removal. The Tribunal set aside the previous Order-in-Appeal and reinstated the Order-in-Original with modifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>