<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 990 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the goods were intended for the specified purpose of steel manufacture, despite facing losses during transportation and handling. The decision underscored the significance of considering losses during transit and the intended use of imported goods in determining the applicability of anti-dumping duty exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 990 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the goods were intended for the specified purpose of steel manufacture, despite facing losses during transportation and handling. The decision underscored the significance of considering losses during transit and the intended use of imported goods in determining the applicability of anti-dumping duty exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>