<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 809 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to address the inclusion/exclusion of the appellant&#039;s name in the Central Excise Licence and emphasized that such matters should be resolved through legal channels. It dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities and stating that the appellant should have taken legal action against the alleged fraudulent documents promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 809 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to address the inclusion/exclusion of the appellant&#039;s name in the Central Excise Licence and emphasized that such matters should be resolved through legal channels. It dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities and stating that the appellant should have taken legal action against the alleged fraudulent documents promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>