<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 753 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151787</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court ruled in a case concerning the detention of inputs/raw materials by Central Excise authorities. The court held that there was no valid reason for the continued detention of the goods after verification and testing had been conducted. It emphasized that detention orders should not impede business operations and manufacturing activities. The court directed the authorities to allow the petitioner to use the detained goods upon furnishing a bank guarantee of two lakh rupees. Cooperation in adjudication proceedings was deemed mandatory, and the detention order would be lifted upon providing the bank guarantee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:55:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 753 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151787</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court ruled in a case concerning the detention of inputs/raw materials by Central Excise authorities. The court held that there was no valid reason for the continued detention of the goods after verification and testing had been conducted. It emphasized that detention orders should not impede business operations and manufacturing activities. The court directed the authorities to allow the petitioner to use the detained goods upon furnishing a bank guarantee of two lakh rupees. Cooperation in adjudication proceedings was deemed mandatory, and the detention order would be lifted upon providing the bank guarantee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>