https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151785 The Court denied the petitioner's request for interim relief based on the utilization of Cenvat credit. Despite previous leniency in similar cases, the Court found the petitioner's conduct, including removing goods without duty payment, disqualified them from receiving interim orders. The Court emphasized that the petitioner had been given an opportunity to present their case before the Chief Commissioner, but their actions demonstrated a lack of eligibility for relief. The decision underscores the need to assess individual circumstances and behavior when considering interim relief applications and the importance of allowing parties to be heard before rulings are made. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:46:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151785 The Court denied the petitioner's request for interim relief based on the utilization of Cenvat credit. Despite previous leniency in similar cases, the Court found the petitioner's conduct, including removing goods without duty payment, disqualified them from receiving interim orders. The Court emphasized that the petitioner had been given an opportunity to present their case before the Chief Commissioner, but their actions demonstrated a lack of eligibility for relief. The decision underscores the need to assess individual circumstances and behavior when considering interim relief applications and the importance of allowing parties to be heard before rulings are made. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151785