<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 496 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee did not conceal or furnish inaccurate particulars of income, acting in good faith and falling victim to fraud by BSAL. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was deemed inapplicable, leading to the partial allowance of the appeal and the deletion of the imposed penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:11:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 496 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee did not conceal or furnish inaccurate particulars of income, acting in good faith and falling victim to fraud by BSAL. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was deemed inapplicable, leading to the partial allowance of the appeal and the deletion of the imposed penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>