<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151772</link>
    <description>Dependent agent permanent establishment profit attribution under article 7 of the India-Singapore DTAA is distinct from the arm&#039;s length remuneration paid to the dependent agent. Profits attributable to the foreign enterprise&#039;s permanent establishment must be determined separately on a functional and factual basis; the agent&#039;s commission does not by itself exhaust Indian tax liability. On that basis, exclusion of AXN channel advertisement revenue from Indian taxation was unsustainable where it depended solely on the arm&#039;s length remuneration proposition. Interest for advance-tax defaults was not chargeable where tax was deductible at source, and limited issues required fresh adjudication by the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151772</link>
      <description>Dependent agent permanent establishment profit attribution under article 7 of the India-Singapore DTAA is distinct from the arm&#039;s length remuneration paid to the dependent agent. Profits attributable to the foreign enterprise&#039;s permanent establishment must be determined separately on a functional and factual basis; the agent&#039;s commission does not by itself exhaust Indian tax liability. On that basis, exclusion of AXN channel advertisement revenue from Indian taxation was unsustainable where it depended solely on the arm&#039;s length remuneration proposition. Interest for advance-tax defaults was not chargeable where tax was deductible at source, and limited issues required fresh adjudication by the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>