<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151772</link>
    <description>Under the India-Singapore DTAA, payment of arm&#039;s length remuneration to a dependent agent does not by itself exhaust the profits attributable to a dependent agent permanent establishment; profits must still be attributed separately to the foreign enterprise on a functional and factual basis under article 7. On that reasoning, exclusion of AXN advertisement revenue from Indian taxation, being based on the same premise, was unsustainable. The article also notes that interest under sections 234B and 234C was treated as not chargeable where tax was deductible at source, following coordinate bench and Special Bench decisions, and that only limited issues were remanded for fresh consideration by the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151772</link>
      <description>Under the India-Singapore DTAA, payment of arm&#039;s length remuneration to a dependent agent does not by itself exhaust the profits attributable to a dependent agent permanent establishment; profits must still be attributed separately to the foreign enterprise on a functional and factual basis under article 7. On that reasoning, exclusion of AXN advertisement revenue from Indian taxation, being based on the same premise, was unsustainable. The article also notes that interest under sections 234B and 234C was treated as not chargeable where tax was deductible at source, following coordinate bench and Special Bench decisions, and that only limited issues were remanded for fresh consideration by the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>