<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 556 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order for the year 2001-02 as time-barred due to lack of evidence on the service date. For the year 2002-03, the Tribunal upheld the classification of rental income as &quot;Income from house property&quot; and disallowed related expenses, dismissing the appeal. Other grounds, such as the addition of &quot;miscellaneous income&quot; and charging of interest under section 234B, were dismissed due to lack of prosecution by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 556 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order for the year 2001-02 as time-barred due to lack of evidence on the service date. For the year 2002-03, the Tribunal upheld the classification of rental income as &quot;Income from house property&quot; and disallowed related expenses, dismissing the appeal. Other grounds, such as the addition of &quot;miscellaneous income&quot; and charging of interest under section 234B, were dismissed due to lack of prosecution by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>